|
Ergonomics Best Practices
Determining Manual Material Handling Risk
Recognizing the importance of proper manual material handling [MMH] is a critical step in the job improvement process. There are many types of manual material handling tasks in industry, for example, lifting raw materials and finished products, pushing carts, and carrying boxes. These tasks represent a continuum of ergonomic exposure from low risk to high risk.
The most common body part affected by MMH is the back, which often suffers strains, sprains, herniated discs, joint inflammation, and dislocation. The average cost of each low back injury is $24,000, as reported by the National Council on Compensation Insurance.
Determining Which Jobs to Improve
In order to make planned and practical MMH improvements in a facility, we must first quantify the exposure to ergonomic risk in a job by gathering three pieces of data:
- Previous musculoskeletal disorders
- Operator discomfort
- Ergonomic risk based on force, frequency, posture, and duration
From these data, we can develop a prioritized task list, which allows management to plan and budget for job improvements based on the amount of associated ergonomic risk. Other factors that help determine priority for improvement are the number of operators exposed to the MMH tasks, the number of shifts during which the tasks are performed, and how often the tasks are completed (daily, weekly, semi-annually, or annually).
Developing Practical Solutions: Some Considerations
Once we have determined which jobs involve the highest ergonomic risk, we can develop practical solutions to address those risks. Organizations typically look for inexpensive and easy solutions that mitigate the operator exposure to ergonomic risk. Important considerations when implementing practical material handling solutions are:
- Ergonomic risk reduction
- Budget
- Productivity
- Number of operators affected
- Timeline
- Ease of implementation
A Hierarchy of Controls
When developing solutions to ergonomic issues, there is an accepted hierarchy of controls: (1) engineering improvements, (2) administrative controls, and (3) work practices modifications.
Engineering controls, such as changes to equipment or workstations, are the method of ergonomic risk reduction Certified Professional Ergonomists prefer. Engineering controls provide an excellent opportunity to remove the source of ergonomic risk from a job.
Administrative controls are changes to task responsibilities that reduce exposure to ergonomic risk factors. These types of controls are dependent on good planning and require management or supervisor oversight. They do not eliminate ergonomic risk factors but may reduce risk exposures to an acceptable level.
Work practices modifications are changes to procedures and work methods that reduce exposure to ergonomic risk factors. These controls depend on individual work behaviors and require ongoing supervision, monitoring, and correction by leaders. They do not eliminate ergonomic risk factors but may reduce some contributing factors.
Why not contact Morrison Company today for an ergonomic review of your manufacturing or distribution facility operations.
|